European crime fiction in the crosshair
n°5 May-June-July 2006

 

Modern police
and European citizen

 

 


The Policeman, a Man in Uniform

Lena Blaudez, journalist and author of crime fiction living in Berlin
Translation: Claire Gorrara

What is a man in a uniform? Is it someone like you, someone like me? Or is he someone a little different?

Is he dressed quite simply in an appropriate manner as a powerful member of a group equally dressed in a uniform fashion? Is he the authoritarian arm of execution of a particular power base? Or is he a hero, Gary Cooper-like, in the style of High Noon ?

At the beginning of the 1980s in Berlin, then capital of the GDR, a man in uniform (m.i.u.) shouted: ‘Show me your papers. That's all very well. It is half past midnight and you are walking around here even though you don't live here. I'm going to make a note of that. So you're one of those women who support ‘Macht Schwerter zu Pfulgscharen', are you?' (1)

In the middle of the 1980s, on the border between Hungary and Yugoslavia, a m.i.u. shouted: ‘You should admit that you wanted to escape. What do you think it would feel like if I were to stub my cigarette out on your wrist?'

At the beginning of the 1990s in Lagos, Nigeria, a m.i.u., aiming a machine gun, demanded: ‘Give me money or you're dead'.

In the middle of the 1990s in Cotonou, Benin, a m.i.u. shouted: ‘Get out of the car! You've just come the wrong way down a one-way street. I am therefore confiscating your car…. Okay, 500 CFA and we'll forget the whole thing. Let's go and get a drink; it's on me'.

At the end of the 1990s in Berlin, capital of the Federal Republic of Germany, a m.i.u. shouted: ‘Get off! A bike on the pavement, you're liable for a fine of 20 euros. No, you're right, I wouldn't risk my life riding on the road here either – even so it's a fine of 20 euros'.

So who is the man in a uniform? Is it someone like you, someone like me? It doesn't matter. Or is he someone who is, in a way, less distinctive?

(1) Translator's note: the refers to an East German peace movement that literally translates as ‘From Swords into Plough-Shares'


Help! The Cops are Everywhere

Etienne Borgers
Translation: Claire Gorrara

The crime novel uses and abuses the police…

Yet, the crime novel first began by favouring the private investigator, amateur or professional, the descendent of the adventurer of 19 th century serials who was then plunged into murder mysteries. But very quickly, the police became part of the picture, as helper for the private investigator and above all as the symbol of justice and punishment.

We only need refer to Edgar Poe or Conan Doyle's adventures of Sherlock Holmes, important reference points for the Anglo-Saxon tradition.

Essentially focused on a return to order and normality, the first crime novels sought to re-establish order and normality in a society presented as suddenly prey to the disorder of crime. The preference was for bloody crime, the greatest of transgressions, the inadmissible act that the investigator as hero had to struggle with in order to discover the solution to the mystery. In the finale, his quest and struggle aimed to restore order, balance and decorum in an unchanging society whose fundamental structures were rarely criticised in the text generated.

As the crime novel developed and new variations evolved, it became clear to many authors that those who in daily contact with such inadmissible acts were generally to be found within the institutions of law and order, mostly those departments dealing with murder. So imperceptibly, the second serial hero of the crime novel in the twentieth century was created: the police investigator.

Authors returned to the sources of French crime fiction with their policemen and official investigations, from Vidocq to Gaboriau. Of course, these characters were brought up to date, adapted to suit their era by their authors, and eventually culminated in the magisterial creation of Maigret by Simenon, a police character who featured in nearly 80 novels from the late 1920s onwards and who had an enormous impact on the literary genre.

By a number of different pathways, the cop as leading protagonist became one of the key elements of the crime novel, whether Francophone or Anglo-Saxon.

Even when the American tradition created one of the most durable archetypes of the modern crime novel: the private detective. This private professional investigator struggled in a more realist world than that of his predecessors. He was a character who sometimes took it upon himself to impose justice and who did not always succeed in his ventures. He was troubled by life and by a social order that he could not always accept as he found it. Yet, the American tradition of crime novels also ended up by concentrating on the role of the cop, whether that meant thrillers mixing action and investigations or more classic romans noirs. This slide towards the central character of the cop happened all the more quickly as the myth of the American PI became ‘overused' by noir writers from other cultures and became the stuff of pastiche from the 1950s onwards.

The magisterial transposition of the PI onto the silver screen from the 1940s must not be forgotten. Adapted directly from American hard-boiled crime fiction, the character of the PI gave birth to the first classics of film noir and contributed of course to the overrepresentation of the mythic PI.

The creation of Ed McBain's 87 th precinct and its policemen – a series begun in 1956 and that is still going strong today – was one of the most striking examples of the return of the character of the policeman, after the reign of the PI.

In addition, from the 1980s onwards, police characters forced their way into Anglo-Saxon crime novels, especially American crime novels. But this time, the net was cast more widely and crime fiction recruited the likes of forensic experts, police squads who was supposed to be ‘anti' everything imaginable (from drugs to terrorism), the police who were ‘the police of the police' (the notorious Internal Affairs units), cops from the C.I.D., cops who provided special protection and many more that I must have forgotten.

Of course, there was also, from the 1990s onwards, the plethora of characters from the many different police forensic units, a subtle variation on the forensic expert who was also being overused in the pages of crime fiction. From now on, scientific experts would be the key figures in the crime intrigues and able to solve the mystery.

The evidence is incontrovertible; the police have literarily invaded the late twentieth-century crime novel and its early twenty-first century successor.

To all of this must be added TV police serials and series. The fan base for such series is enormous in this mass media whose programmes now reach the huge audiences previously enjoyed by genre literature, such as crime fiction, during the twentieth century up until the middle of the 1970s. Crime series, featuring cop-detectives, police stations, street detectives and forensic experts have been steadily on the increase since the 1980s and have now reached the point where they are everywhere on French, English and American screens. No one can escape them.

Amongst this abundance of crime novels and TV series featuring a cop as the main characters, some authors can still be found who edge this official hero of modern society towards darker, even completely noir, territory. Even so, the vast majority of the stories that we are told serve up yet again the image of the peace maker from the first mystery novels but this time in the guise of a cop, thereby upholding the image of normality and order in modern society via the intermediary of a character whose sworn duty it is to defend such notions.

Why is this so? Is it because our modern societies are so in need of reassurance that we have to display the soothing image of a paternalistic and repressive power in the pages of this police fiction, a reassurance demanded by a reading public that cannot find peace itself? Is this a means of exorcising demons, those of society?

On the other hand, mystery - and the quest for an explanation – is one of the key traits of the human psyche. It is a primal need that is deeply rooted in our humanity; it is a distorted image of the existential questions that are deep within us. It is this mystery that motivates us and drives scientific curiosity, superstitions, religions and crime fiction in general.

This is the mystery that can be interpreted and solved by the sorcerer. Like the popular scientific investigators who use magic and a knowledge that is known only to the select few, impenetrable to the man in the street, these investigators also use magic to explain the mystery and avert the crisis. The reader or viewer is only asked to keep faith and is rewarded with reassurance.

Through all of this, the police that surround us want to project an image of modernity, without the reader really being sure how to interpret this term. Of course, as in the past, there is a certain type of policeman who should act directly on behalf of the citizen, protecting and helping him.

If the location where we see this role being the most clearly enacted is on the public highway where the citizen directly benefits, in other areas of police activity, their role and their aims are less clearly defined and more uncertain. In contrast, official power - whatever form it takes – remains the driving force behind the armed units of this police, a political power that is ready to turn its weapons on those that it is meant to protect. This ‘modern' police has only become modern in order to control more effectively its citizens, to contain them better, to protect even more the super-rich and those who hold the reins of power. As in the past… little has changed.

Except that modernity has allowed those in power, systematically and cynically, to frighten the wits out of those of weak convictions via a ‘mass' media, less and less independently minded. They lead them, like sheep, to call for still more ‘modern' controls and checks of which they are the first victims, set against a backdrop of zealous police enforcement.

As in all corrupt situations, without taking much responsibility for the fundamental questions asked, the police in Europe have kept going thanks to its great tradition of fornicating with ‘the ‘homo politicus'.

But in our survey of main character types, les us not forget the psychologists of all persuasions, those allies who come to the aid of the judicial system and its technocrats. It is the psychologists who are currently taking over the so called ‘detective' novel in great numbers… when they are not dominating the court room in real life.

These psychologists are but other high priests of a fake science that, in modern times, has reached the status of a religion. They are complicit in media manipulations; they are the hidden supporters of advertising, of the televisual age and stage how politics is presented to the voter. They are everywhere and have become the sorcerers of contemporary crime fiction. Just look at your thrillers and the repeated formulas of the best-sellers list.

And it's not over. We are soon going to calling on them in greater numbers. Haven't we just ‘discovered' that the signs of juvenile delinquency can be detected in children as young as three? I expect that we will soon be again measuring the circumference of heads and the length of noses, alongside magic tests that are supposed to weigh up our mental capacities. What good times they have to look forward to… It will be the meeting of the sorcerers and Pinocchio, as in real life as in crime fiction, as in our daily lives…

I hope that the traffic police can forgive me, but I really can't see the police devoted to the average citizen that political propaganda has so vaunted in recent years. On the other hand, in the thriller and the modern traditional crime novel he is omnipresent – the cops are everywhere!

For more than fifty years, mainstream fiction has given up confronting the real problems in society and has been of no help. It is therefore imperative that we fall back on the roman noir. It is often very pessimistic but seems to be the only genre that has dealt insightfully with the themes of corruption, police excesses and the real battle against evil and murder.

The roman noir is the only cure for the crime virus and the cravings for authoritarian solutions. It is the last line of defence before the law and order pandemic that the sorcerers-apprentices are happy to propagate; those, who, from their bastions of power, claim to be our guides and protectors and, finally to govern us.


On the Tedium of Police Work

Michael koltan
Fribourg, philosopher and musician living in Friburg

Translation: Claire Gorrara

It is really quite strange but, generally, literature relating to detective fiction rarely analyses the fact that there are not two but three parties involved: the author, the detective and the police. If the police are rarely considered as an interested party, this can be attributed to the contempt in which they have been held from the beginnings of the genre: ‘The Parisian police, so lauded for its acumen, is cunning, nothing more', declares Dupin in Edgar Poe's Murders in the Rue Morgue . ‘The results obtained are not infrequently surprising but they are, for the most part, simply due to diligence and activity. In the cases where these qualities are unavailing, their schemes fail'. In the classic detective story, the police are boring bureaucrats who, when confronted with real problems, invariably fail and must call upon the help of a brilliant detective.

The transition to the hard-boiled novel did not improve the situation. Whilst the previous charges were incompetence and tediousness, they were now replaced by brutality and corruption. Cops became the enemies of the private eye, putting obstacles in the way of his investigations. This model has reached the point that, in James Ellroy's Lloyd Hopkins trilogy, there are now only cops who are, to some extent or other, on a downward spiral, whilst the character of the private eye, with whom the reader identifies, has completely disappeared.

One interesting point is that there is one school of detective fiction that glorifies precisely the tedium of police work. The Belgian, Georges Simenon, with his Inspector Maigret, seems to be the originator of this variation that hits the reader like an over-the-counter sleeping pill with no side effects. But what was for many years considered simply a Belgian particularity has, in recent times, generated incredible sales figures. It began with Mankell and continues with Donna Leon's stupid Commissioner Brunetti. I remain as bemused by the appeal of these books as I am by by the music of Peter Gabriel or the films of Robin Williams.


Beward of the Bull

Klaus Viehmann (Berlin)
Translation: Claire Gorrara

In German, bulle = bull but also cop

The author's name can be translated as ‘herdsman'

The Practising Vet, no 81

Summary:

Coming into contact with unrestrained bulls is always potentially dangerous, especially if you do not read their body language correctly. Observation reveals that, as they grow older, bulls are less and less inclined to accept being mastered and, in general, not minded to surrender. They demonstrate this through clear signs of their high social standing (such as body stance, hanging tongue, dribble, grunting etc), whilst the disdain with which they are regarded by humans only increases the potential for conflict. Practical advice on how to approach them can reduce the risks of a serious and damaging attack by bulls when they are in pasture or penned up.

It is important to emphasise the fact that an early positive encounter between human and animal can give valuable insights into how to handle a bull.

Key words: body language, potential danger, bulls



powered by FreeFind

© 2005 europolar
Home | Edito | Staff | Translators | Archives | Links | Webmaster | Site map | Webmaster: Emma